Thursday, August 24, 2006
Thursday, August 17, 2006
Are We Giving Clear or Confusing Invitations?
I have sat through many invitations times over the years and I believe we sometimes get stuck in a tradition instead of offering a Biblical truth to those listening.
Over the past few years while speaking at children's ministry events, I've tried to stress the idea of keeping things simple, real, & true when teaching children. Children have such a literal mentality.
A few days ago I spoke at a seminar and was discussing the topic of words that we use when teaching children.
As an example, I gave phrases that are commonly used during the invitation time in our churches.
Lets look at the list:
Will you invite Jesus into your heart?
Will you surrender your life to Christ?
Will you promise to commit your life to Christ?
Will you confess your sins and ask Jesus to forgive you?
Will you make Christ the Lord of your life?
Will you give your heart to Jesus?
Will you accept the Lord Jesus Christ and trust Him as your personal Savior?Will you believe that Jesus Christ died for your sins and rose from the grave?
The group of 70 agreed that all were fine invitations, but are they?
How did you do? I broke the questions down below.
Let look at each phrase.
Will you invite Jesus into your heart?
This one is confusing! Children picture a literal asking Jesus to come into their Valentine shaped heart.
Will you surrender your life to Christ?
This one is confusing. This one puts the focus on man's actions. We give nothing to Christ. We must accept what He has done.
Will you promise to commit your life to Christ?
This can be confusing. Salvation is based on God's Grace alone and not our actions. Once saved, the commitment will come.
Will you confess your sins and ask Jesus to forgive you?
This one is confusing. Repentance is involved with Salvation. Confession is involved with your daily Christian walk once you are saved. There is no way a lost person can confess every sin they have commited.
Will you make Christ the Lord of your life?
This one is confusing. This one I like the least. Jesus is the Lord of Lords and who are we to make Him anything. We must accept that He is Lord and submit to His Lordship.
Will you give your heart to Jesus?
This one is confusing. Children take this literally and gives an idea that we must do something rather thnn accepting a free gift.
Will you accept the Lord Jesus Christ and trust Him as your personal Savior?This one is clear. Each person must personally trust in Jesus alone.
Will you believe that Jesus Christ Died for your sins and rove from the grave? This one is clear. We must place our trust in what Jesus did.
I believe that we must examine how we share the Gospel. We are commanded to share this Good News, and we must do it accurately. If not we may be sharing a false hope.I would enjoy reading your thoughts on this subject.
If you have other phrases that you’ve heard, feel free to share those.
Posted by
MARK
at
3:49 PM
0
comments
Wednesday, August 16, 2006
Homosexuality, A Sin?
I read an interesting sermon today entitled “Conflict in the Church: Is Homosexuality a Sin?” The sermon was presented on January 29, 2006 by Betsy Singleton, pastor of Quapaw Quarter United Methodist Church in Little Rock, AR. She is also the wife of Arkansas Congressmen Vic Snyder.
This was her fourth sermon in a series of “Difficult Questions Christians Face.” She begins with how she developed her thoughts and ideas. She referred to “four basic tools to help us listen for God’s living word to us today” and they were “the primary one is Scripture, in addition to tradition, experience and reason.”
If you allow me to do so, I’d like to quote her definitions of the four tools above. These quotes are taken from another sermon that I will post later.
“1) Scripture. The first is scripture. While it does not and cannot specifically answer questions about which its writers knew absolutely nothing thousands of years ago, scripture is the story of God’s promises to us, not a rigid rule book. Like some Christians, we could pick apart its contents and find one or two lines to support almost any position, but that violates the integrity of its historical formation over thousands of years as people evolved in their relationship and understanding of God. The story contained in Genesis to Revelation, particularly the life, death and resurrection of Jesus, is our primary guide.
2) Christian tradition is another tool. It includes church teachings over the last 2000 years: the accumulation of creeds, liturgies, prayers, hymns, as well as church history. For United Methodists, it also includes the Book of Discipline and The Book of Resolutions, our own laws and official positions that guide our Christian actions. For example, our church has an official statement on inter-religious dialogue that should help guide our discussions with persons of other faith traditions. We may not always agree with these (and I do not always), but we do believe that God’s Spirit is working with human leaders to speak anew to the church today.
3) Experience is a third tool we bring to answering difficult questions. Experience refers to how the Spirit of God is at work in our lives as a community of faith for one another and for the world. It is not merely about how you or I experience something, but how God’s Spirit is at work through us, our prayers and our mutual witness.
4) Reason is another tool. Along with experience, John Wesley, our founder, believed that we must apply our ability to reason using the other tools, so that we can make a reasonable statement of our beliefs, and know why we believe what we believe.”
(Taken from “Is Christianity the Only Way?” – Betsy Singleton January 8, 2006)
She also uses personal stories of people she has met over the years who struggle in homosexuality and how they came to their conclusions.
Below are a few quotes taken from her sermon:
“The other two passages in the Old Testament refer to Leviticus 18:22 and 20:13: “a man shall not lie with a male as with a woman. It is an abomination.”
Why is this?
In ancient Israel there are two kinds of evil: 1) sin and 2) uncleanness. “Sin” is an intentional rebellion against God. Yet “uncleanness” comes from contact with some physical object—animals, foods, corpses, pagan rites, sexual process, etc. In other words, it’s contagious. Thus ancient Israel understood cleanness to be about wholeness, perfection, and completeness, so that this requirement of completeness means that classes cannot be mixed: cattle are not to be bred to a different kind; fields are not sown using different seeds, etc. Thus homosexual behavior is understood similarly as mixing what should not be mixed; it is uncleanness, not sin”
“Now to the New Testament. In 1 Corinthians 6, Paul provides a list of those who are living lives in opposition to God’s plans including male prostitutes and sodomites. There is debate about what these two Greek words actually mean. Some believe the words constitute a reference to any homosexual behavior, and some believe the text is only citing a specific vice called “pederasty,” a practice of male adult domination over a submissive minor male for sexual purposes. In Romans 1, Paul addresses our fallen human nature, including examples of same-sex relations by both genders. For Paul, this behavior is a result of sin because it is chosen behavior. The problem for readers today is that we also take into account that homosexuality may be “natural” for some and thus not chosen, sinful behavior. Neither passage recognizes a possible committed homosexual relationship as reality because that was not understood to be normative for some.”
Through her teaching we can see that she believes that Scripture alone is not enough. You find yourself in trouble when you start using the thoughts of man to base your beliefs on. 2 Timothy 3:16 tells us that the Bible is inspired and sufficient for all teaching, reproof, correction and training. I guess she missed the “all” part of the verse. I also didn’t see an asterisk pointing me to a note at the bottom of the page that says “this will not apply in 2000 years.”
Scripture on homosexuality is just as relevant today as it was then. That’s why Paul was addressing the issue above. It was rampant then as it is now. The same Word applies to then and now. You cannot take the unchanging Word from an unchanging God and interpret your personal beliefs into them. The opposite is true. Our beliefs, actions, and life should be derived from God’s Holy Word. It’s either right in all aspects of life or no part at all.
I also wanted to comment on her “natural” thoughts. Lets say that she’s correct in saying that homosexuality is natural and cannot be wrong. Ok. I said it. I believe it’s natural for people to lie, steal and lust. But the Bible teaches that these are sins as well. So we can’t say it’s ok to lie just because it’s natural. The Bible teaches that the natural man must die. A believer is a new creature bought with a price. And with His strength in us we can say no to the natural things.
Now, should the church raise the sin of homosexuality above any other sin? No, but that’s another post.
Posted by
MARK
at
3:44 PM
0
comments
Labels: Theology
Wednesday, July 26, 2006
Wednesday, July 19, 2006
Tuesday, July 18, 2006
What To Do About Life
Today the Senate passed a law allowing the use of embryos in research. President Bush has promised a veto. Here are a few quotes from our leaders. I would like to hear your thoughts on the matter.
"The president believes strongly that for the purpose of research it's inappropriate for the federal government to finance something that many people consider murder. He's one of them," White House spokesman Tony Snow.
"I do not believe that a frozen embryo in a fertility clinic freezer constitutes human life. Now, I believe that being pro-life involves helping the living. Regenerative medicine is pro-life and pro-family," Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah.
"It is human, and it's alive, and under H.R. 810 we say that the federal government is going to fund the destruction, the killing, of that embryo," Sen. Rick Santorum, R-Pa.
"There has been an upsurge of demand, Support for the legislation has crossed every line we could imagine, certainly partisan lines, ethnic, racial, geographic lines." said Sen.Hillary Clinton, D-NY.
"I strongly believe neither Congress nor independent researchers nor any human being for that matter should be allowed to, in effect, play God by determining that one life is inherently more valuable than another," Sen. David Vitter, R-La.
"These embryos are never going to be babies," said California Democratic Sen. Dianne Feinstein.
Posted by
MARK
at
3:39 PM
0
comments
Labels: News
Saturday, July 15, 2006
A Sobering Thought
Posted by
MARK
at
3:37 PM
0
comments
Labels: Funnies
Saturday, July 01, 2006
Monday, June 19, 2006
Unselfishness
Posted by
MARK
at
3:33 PM
0
comments
Labels: Funnies
Friday, May 12, 2006
Friday, April 21, 2006
My Cross
Posted by
MARK
at
3:25 PM
0
comments
Labels: Poetry
Thursday, April 20, 2006
A Remarkable Quote
— Ronald Reagan
Posted by
MARK
at
3:24 PM
0
comments
Labels: Quotes
Monday, April 03, 2006
A Remarkable Quote
~Henry Wadsworth Longfellow~
Posted by
MARK
at
3:23 PM
0
comments
Labels: Quotes
Sunday, March 19, 2006
Chicago Trip Photos
Here are a few pictures of our trip to Chicago.
Ball park is closed in March. So I got the sign.
Looking down on the famous water tower.
The only survior of the famouse Chicago fire.
Posted by
MARK
at
3:21 PM
0
comments
Labels: Photos
Monday, February 20, 2006
Who Can Know the Mind of God
That question is so hard to understand. My mind draws a blank trying to conceive such an answer. Who can know the mind of God? The mind of God could never be understood. The mind that thought a thought and the universe was created. How can you or I ever estimate the knowledge contained in the mind of God? The mind of God, it controls the sun and the moon. At His thought, the world could end. The mind of God controls our world, saves our souls, and at the same moment ponders the praise of His angels. Oh, the mind of God, it made you and me. To the very smallest insect to the greatest mountain known to man, it all came from the mind of God. He thought it all. He thought of us way before He even made the universe. Who can know the mind of God? No one. The mind of God, how great, how mighty, how holy. I wonder what He is thinking now. No one really knows, but He knows every hair on our head, every tear we’ve cried, and He never forgets small things such as those. Oh, how great the mind of God. The mind that opened the Red Sea wants us to open our hearts to Him. The mind that caught a bush on fire wants our lives to be on fire for Him. The mind that had to decide to give His Son’s live for us wants us to give our lives for him. Oh, the mind of God, I will never know the mind of God, but I know that I am on His mind and so are you.
Posted by
MARK
at
3:17 PM
0
comments
Labels: Theology
Tuesday, February 07, 2006
A Remarkable Poem
Plans fail.
Hearts break.
Minds forget.
Bodies ache.
Love fades.
Faith goes.
Hope dies.
Dreams disappear.
Days end.
But there’s tomorrow.
2004 Mark Edward Leslie January 02, 2004
Posted by
MARK
at
3:16 PM
0
comments
Labels: Poetry
Wednesday, February 01, 2006
A Remarkable Quote
~Henry David Thoreau~
Posted by
MARK
at
3:15 PM
0
comments
Labels: Quotes
Tuesday, January 10, 2006
Thursday, December 29, 2005
A New Year's Poem
Another year has come.
Another year has ended.
Time goes on.
It never waits.
Plans are unfulfilled.
Letters are unwritten.
The phone call was never made.
The church was never entered.
That friend was never forgiven.
That promotion wasn’t given.
That vacation wasn’t taken.
The tree house was never built.
The room was never painted.
That book was never read.
Another year has ended,
But another has come.
Remember time goes on
And it never waits.
2004 Mark Edward Leslie January 02, 2004
Posted by
MARK
at
3:10 PM
0
comments
Labels: Poetry
A Remarkable Quote
Most people spend more time planning Christmas than they do planning their lives.
--- Unknown
Posted by
MARK
at
3:09 PM
0
comments
Labels: Quotes













